Human-System Communications for Expectation Mismatch - Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University
Loading Events

PhD Thesis Defense

March

27
Fri
Huy Quyen Ngo PhD Student Robotics Institute,
Carnegie Mellon University
Friday, March 27
11:00 am to 12:30 pm
3305 Newell-Simon Hall
Human-System Communications for Expectation Mismatch
Abstract
Robots, and autonomous systems in general, are becoming increasingly advancing beyond traditional functions. This can potentially facilitate the mismatch between human expectations of system behaviors during interaction, especially when the systems behave unexpectedly. Unexpected system behaviors could induce negative emotional responses in humans, which not all systems have the capability of recognizing and detecting in real-time. To prevent such situations, systems should communicate system behavior expectations to humans during the task. In addition, after a mismatch, the systems should perform post-hoc strategies to mitigate human’s negative emotional responses.
This thesis first investigates how systems can communicate expectations to humans in-situ using legible motion planning based on Potential Field and Vector Field. Such obstacle-aware intent-expressive motion planner could produce comparably legible paths to conventional methods.

Next, this thesis explores how systems can detect subtle emotional responses to unexpected system behaviors, by designing and collecting data from a human study of participants interacting with a driving simulation system to perform non-critical tasks. Findings shown that participants’ emotional responses to different stimuli such as surprise, confusion, and frustration, could be distinguished based on facial action units, providing important insights to building a real-time autonomous emotional response detector.

Finally, this thesis studies a few post-hoc expectation mismatch mitigation strategies. Specifically, this thesis focuses on acknowledgment, apology, and explanation to mitigate negative emotional responses by humans using verbal, visual, and nonverbal modalities. Analyses shown that acknowledgment and apology as sole mitigation strategies are not sufficient to influence people’s emotional responses in driving simulator settings, and further actions from the system are preferred. Moreover, different modalities of explanation, such as verbal and visual, are comparably effective in reducing unexpectedness in robot behaviors, and such modes of explanations could retain their effectiveness cross-platform.


Thesis Committee Members:
Aaron Steinfeld (Chair)
Fernando De La Torre Frade
Nikolas Martelaro
Brian Mok (BMW Group)