Driver responses to navigation information on full-windshield, head-up displays

Aaron Steinfeld and Paul Green
Journal Article, International Journal of Vehicle Design, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 135-149, January, 1998

Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.


While seated in a vehicle mockup, drivers (6 young, 6 old) made same/different judgements of simultaneously shown pairs of slides (real intersections and navigation displays that could be for them). The navigation information was presented on either an instrument panel (IP) display or superimposed on the road scene, simulating a full-windshield, head-up display (HUD). Response times to full-windshield HUDs (1170 ms) were shorter than IP displays (1511 ms), a difference of about 20 percent. HUD color had no significant effect on response time, but displays aligned with the road scene produced times slightly faster than misaligned ones (34 ms difference). As reported previously, plan and aerial views were responded to faster than perspective views. Due to high error rates in some conditions, continued experimental evaluation of full-windshield HUDs is desired.

author = {Aaron Steinfeld and Paul Green},
title = {Driver responses to navigation information on full-windshield, head-up displays},
journal = {International Journal of Vehicle Design},
year = {1998},
month = {January},
volume = {19},
number = {2},
pages = {135-149},
} 2017-09-13T10:49:40-04:00