A Comparison Study of Four Texture Synthesis Algorithms on Regular and Near-regular Textures
Tech. Report, CMU-RI-TR-04-01, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2004
Abstract
We compare the performance of four texture synthesis algorithms on synthesizing regular and near-regular textures in this report. Our results show that the near-regular texture synthesis remains to be a challenging problem. This is because a near-regular texture demonstrates both global regularity and local randomness in its texture pattern. It is difficult to preserve both properties in the synthetic textures. The comparison indicates that a specially-designed texture synthesis algorithm that respects the nature of near-regular textures can produce more faithfully synthesized textures than general purpose state of the art synthesis algorithms.
BibTeX
@techreport{Lin-2004-8846,author = {Wen-Chieh Lin and James H. Hays and Chenyu Wu and Vivek Kwatra and Yanxi Liu},
title = {A Comparison Study of Four Texture Synthesis Algorithms on Regular and Near-regular Textures},
year = {2004},
month = {January},
institute = {Carnegie Mellon University},
address = {Pittsburgh, PA},
number = {CMU-RI-TR-04-01},
}
Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.