The Robotics Institute
Search the site
RI | Publications | Comparison of 3D Haptic Peg-In-Hole Tasks in Real and Virtual Environments

Text only version of this site

Comparison of 3D Haptic Peg-In-Hole Tasks in Real and Virtual Environments
B. Unger, A. Nicolaidis, P. Berkelman, A. Thompson, R. Klatzky, and R. Hollis
Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '01), Vol. 3, September, 2001, pp. 1751 - 1756.

Jump to: Download | Abstract | Notes | Text Reference | BibTeX Reference

Download [Help]

Adobe portable document format (pdf) [383 KB]

Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Abstract

We describe an experimental arrangement for comparison of user performance during a real and a virtual 3-D peg-in-hole task. Tasks are performed using a unique six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) magnetic levitation haptic device. The arrangement allows a user to exert and experience real and virtual forces using the same 6-DOF device. During the virtual task, a peg and hole are rendered haptically, and visual feedback is provided through a graphical display. During the real task, a physical peg is attached to the underside of the haptic device. Using only real forces/torques, the peg is inserted into a hole in a plate attached to a force/torque sensor, while positions/orientations are measured by the haptic device. Positions/orientations and forces/torques are recorded for both modes. Preliminary results indicate increased task time, larger total forces and more failures occur with the virtual task. Recorded data reveal user strategies that are similar for both tasks. Quantitative analysis of the strategies employed should lead to identi cation of signi cant factors in haptic interface design and haptic rendering techniques.

Notes

Associated lab/group: Microdynamic Systems Laboratory
Associated project: Psychophysics of Haptic Interaction

Number of pages: 6

Text Reference

B. Unger, A. Nicolaidis, P. Berkelman, A. Thompson, R. Klatzky, and R. Hollis, "Comparison of 3D Haptic Peg-In-Hole Tasks in Real and Virtual Environments," Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '01), Vol. 3, September, 2001, pp. 1751 - 1756.

BibTeX Reference

@inproceedings{Unger_2001_5132,
   author = "Bertram Unger and Alex Nicolaidis and Peter Berkelman and A. Thompson and Roberta Klatzky and Ralph Hollis",
   title = "Comparison of 3D Haptic Peg-In-Hole Tasks in Real and Virtual Environments",
   booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '01)",
   month = "September",
   year = "2001",
   volume = "3",
   pages = "1751 - 1756"
}


The Robotics Institute is part of the School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
For updates and comments, please see these instructions.
This page maintained by robotwebmaster@ri.cmu.edu