Search

Navigator: RI | Publications | Evolution of urban robotic system developments

Graphics enhanced version of this site

Evolution of urban robotic system developments
H. Schempf, unknown, B. Chemel, S.K. Nayar, C. Piepgras, W. Crowley, and S. Boehmke
Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE / ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, September, 1999, pp. 689 - 694.

Jump to: Download | Abstract | Notes | Text Reference | BibTeX Reference


Download [Help]

Adobe portable document format (pdf) [540 KB]

Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.


Abstract

Urban settings represent a challenging environment for teleoperated and autonomous robot systems. We present several different improved and novel robotic locomotion and exploration/inspection systems designed for the arenas of military reconnaissance and even entertainment/toys. The designs presented in this paper focus in on all- and flat-floor teleoperated/autonomous-capability robotic platforms developed at CMU over the past year. The Pandora and Minidora robot systems are tracked robot systems with self-contained computing, power and wireless communications systems. A sensor suite including stereoscopic and panospheric cameras, light-stripers and acoustic sonar-ring(s) allow the systems to operate autonomously. Individually adjustable track-modules give both of these robot systems extreme mobility in natural (vegetation, soils) and man-made (roads, steps) outdoor environments as well as indoor arenas (sewers, staircases, etc.). The Cyclops and Omniclops robot systems are self-driving spherical camera-platforms intended to be deployed on indoor flat-floor terrain for exploration tasks. Both systems also are fully self-contained in terms of locomotion, computing, power, and control. Both systems differ in their design for rolling and steering, as well as the camera sensor used-all these will be detailed in this paper. Locomotion for all the above systems was shown successfully over various flat and extreme terrains, including reconfiguration to best suit the terrain and enable future sensor-supported autonomous operations


Notes

Number of pages: 6


Text Reference

H. Schempf, unknown, B. Chemel, S.K. Nayar, C. Piepgras, W. Crowley, and S. Boehmke, "Evolution of urban robotic system developments," Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE / ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, September, 1999, pp. 689 - 694.


BibTeX Reference

@inproceedings{Schempf_1999_4527,
   author = "Hagen Schempf and unknown and Brian Chemel and S.K. Nayar and Colin Piepgras and William Crowley and Scott Boehmke",
   title = "Evolution of urban robotic system developments",
   booktitle = "Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE / ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics",
   month = "September",
   year = "1999",
   pages = "689 - 694"
}


The Robotics Institute is part of the School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
For updates and comments, please see these instructions.
This page maintained by robotwebmaster@ri.cmu.edu