Search

Navigator: RI | Publications | Methods for Cropline Following

Graphics enhanced version of this site

Methods for Cropline Following
M. Happold
tech. report CMU-RI-TR-00-14, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, May, 2000.

Jump to: Download | Abstract | Notes | Text Reference | BibTeX Reference


Download [Help]

Adobe portable document format (pdf) [873 KB]

Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.


Abstract

The Demeter Project of the National Robotics Enpineering Consortium of Carnegie Mellon University seeks to develop a robotic harvester capable of guiding itself through fields of crop. A variety of techniques for guidance have been experimented with, from GPS to stereo vision. This report details efforts at guidance hy means of processing 2-D images taken from color cameras positioned on each side of a harvester. These efforts are meant to provide a low-cost and computationally inexpensive solution to the positioning problem.

Finding the dividing line between cut and uncut crop in 2-D images, the cropline, is naturally formulated as an image segmentation problem. Although extensive work has been done in this area, most segmentation algorithms do not operate in real-time. Real-time in this context means cycling at 4-5 Hz, which is the approximate minimum cycling time to smoothly guide a harvester travelling at 4 m.p.h. Even with the rapid increases in the speed of computing hardware, sophisticated segmentation routines often take several seconds, if not minutes, to complcte. Therefore, a suitable trade-off between the reliability of results and the speed of the algorithm must be found.

This report covers four methods for finding croplines. These are: a modified version of the algorithm presented by Ollis and Stentz [13]: a model-based color segmenter: a texture-based segmenter; and a color edge-detector. The speed and accuracy of these four algorithms are compared on images of alfalfa and Sudan in flat and bedded fields.


Notes

Associated center: NREC
Associated project: Demeter

Note: Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Robotics


Text Reference

M. Happold, Methods for Cropline Following, tech. report CMU-RI-TR-00-14, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, May, 2000.


BibTeX Reference

@techreport{Happold_2000_4183,
   author = "Michael Happold",
   title = "Methods for Cropline Following",
   institution = "Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University",
   month = "May",
   year = "2000",
   number = "CMU-RI-TR-00-14",
   address = "Pittsburgh, PA",
   note = "Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Robotics"
}


The Robotics Institute is part of the School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
For updates and comments, please see these instructions.
This page maintained by robotwebmaster@ri.cmu.edu