|
|
|
|
RI | Publications | Technology and Field Demonstration of Robotic Search for Antarctic Meteorites
|
|
Text only version of this site
Technology and Field Demonstration of Robotic Search for Antarctic Meteorites
D. Apostolopoulos, M.D. Wagner, B. Shamah, L. Pedersen, K. Shillcutt, and W.L. Whittaker
International Journal of Robotics Research, December, 2000.
Jump to: Download | Abstract | Notes | Text Reference | BibTeX Reference
| Download [Help] |
Adobe portable document format (pdf) [963 KB]
Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
| Abstract |
Meteorites are the only significant source of material from other planets and asteroids, and therefore are of immense scientific value. Antarctica’s frozen and pristine environment has proven to be the best place on Earth to harvest meteorite specimens. The lack of melting and surface erosion keep meteorite falls visible on the ice surface in pristine condition for thousands of years. In this article we describe the robotic technologies and field demonstration that enabled the first discovery of Antarctic meteorites by a robot. Using a novel autonomous control architecture, specialized science sensing, combined manipulation and visual servoing, and Bayesian classification, the Nomad robot found and classified five indigenous meteorites during an expedition to the remote site of Elephant Moraine in January 2000. This article first overviews Nomad’s mechatronic systems, and details the control architecture that governs the robot’s autonomy and classifier that enables the autonomous interpretation of scientific data. It then focuses on the technical results achieved during field demonstrations at Elephant Moraine. Finally, the article discusses the benefits and limitations of robotic autonomy in science missions. Science autonomy is shown as a capable and expandable architecture for exploration and in situ classification. Inefficiencies in the existing implementation are explained with a focus on important lessons that outline future work.
| Notes |
Associated centers: FRC and SRI
Associated project: Robotic Antarctic Meteorite Search
Number of pages: 17
| Text Reference |
D. Apostolopoulos, M.D. Wagner, B. Shamah, L. Pedersen, K. Shillcutt, and W.L. Whittaker, "Technology and Field Demonstration of Robotic Search for Antarctic Meteorites," International Journal of Robotics Research, December, 2000.
| BibTeX Reference |
@article{Apostolopoulos_2000_3361,
author = "Dimitrios Apostolopoulos and Michael D Wagner and Benjamin Shamah and Liam Pedersen and Kimberly Shillcutt and William Red L. Whittaker",
title = "Technology and Field Demonstration of Robotic Search for Antarctic Meteorites",
journal = "International Journal of Robotics Research",
month = "December",
year = "2000"
}