Graphics enhanced version of this site

A Comparison of a Manual and Computer-integrated Production Process in Terms of Process Control decision Making
S.M. Miller and S.R. Bereiter
tech. report CMU-RI-TR-86-06, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, March, 1986.

Jump to: Download | Abstract | Notes | Text Reference | BibTeX Reference

Adobe portable document format (pdf) [1702 KB]

Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

This paper is an investigation into the changes in process control that took place in the body shop of a vehicle assembly plant that was modernized from a principally manual process to one that extensively uses programmable automation. In this study, process control is defined as the information flow and decision-making required to perform basic process operations. We investigate affects of the implementation of a computer-integrated production system on the amount of process control decision-making, the types of process control decisions being made, and the distribution of process control decision-making between humans and machines. We found that as a result of the modernization, the amount of process control decision-making nearly tripled, the emphasis on decisions to meet product quality specifications increased, and the emphasis on decisions related to flexibility in handling a variety of product options decreased. Decisions relating to meeting product quality specifications and to timing and synchronization of tasks were mostly taken on by automated equipment, while decisions relating to the flexibility of the process remained to a large extent under manual control. Whereas humans made nearly 75 percent of the decisions required to assemble and weld a vehicle body in the principally manual system, humans made fewer than ten percent of the comparable decisions in the automated system. The framework used to produce these results provides a general approach for comparing levels of technological sophistication in manufacturing systems in terms of the amount and type of information processing.

Grant ID: #F33615-86-C-5-38

S.M. Miller and S.R. Bereiter, A Comparison of a Manual and Computer-integrated Production Process in Terms of Process Control decision Making, tech. report CMU-RI-TR-86-06, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, March, 1986.

@techreport{Miller_1986_127,
   author = "Steven M Miller and Susan R. Bereiter",
   title = "A Comparison of a Manual and Computer-integrated Production Process in Terms of Process Control decision Making",
   institution = "Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University",
   month = "March",
   year = "1986",
   number = "CMU-RI-TR-86-06",
   address = "Pittsburgh, PA"
}