Search

Navigator: RI | Publications | Two Performance Measures for Evaluating Human Control Strategy

Graphics enhanced version of this site

Two Performance Measures for Evaluating Human Control Strategy
J. Song, Y. Xu, M. Nechyba, and Y. Yam
Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 3, May, 1998, pp. 2250 - 2255.

Jump to: Download | Abstract | Notes | Text Reference | BibTeX Reference


Download [Help]

Adobe portable document format (pdf) [150 KB]

Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.


Abstract

In the last few years, modeling dynamic human control strategy (HCS) is becoming an increasingly popular paradigm in a number of different research areas, such as the intelligent vehicle highway system, virtual reality and robotics. Usually, these models are derived empirically, rather than analytically, from real human input-output control data. As such, there is a great need to develop adequate performance criteria for these models, as few guarantees exist about their theoretical performance. It is our goal in this paper to develop several such criteria. In this paper, we first collect driving data from different individuals through a real-time graphic driving simulator. We then model each individual's control strategy through the flexible cascade neural network learning architecture. Next, we develop two performance measures for evaluating the resulting HCS models, one dealing with obstacle avoidance, the other with tight-turning behavior. Finally, we evaluate the relative skill of different HCS models through the proposed performance criteria.


Notes

Associated center: VASC


Text Reference

J. Song, Y. Xu, M. Nechyba, and Y. Yam, "Two Performance Measures for Evaluating Human Control Strategy," Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 3, May, 1998, pp. 2250 - 2255.


BibTeX Reference

@inproceedings{Song_1998_1078,
   author = "J. Song and Yangsheng Xu and Michael Nechyba and Y. Yam",
   title = "Two Performance Measures for Evaluating Human Control Strategy",
   booktitle = "Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation",
   month = "May",
   year = "1998",
   volume = "3",
   pages = "2250 - 2255"
}


The Robotics Institute is part of the School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
For updates and comments, please see these instructions.
This page maintained by robotwebmaster@ri.cmu.edu