Carnegie Mellon University
Multi-Sensor Mobile Robot Localization For Diverse Environments

Manuela Veloso
Proceedings of the RoboCup Symposium, August, 2013.

  • Adobe portable document format (pdf) (972KB)
Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Mobile robot localization with different sensors and algorithms is a widely studied problem, and there have been many approaches proposed, with considerable degrees of success. However, every sensor and algorithm has limitations, due to which we believe no single localization algorithm can be ``perfect,'' or universally applicable to all situations. Laser rangefinders are commonly used for localization, and state-of-the-art algorithms are capable of achieving sub-centimeter accuracy in environments with features observable by laser rangefinders. Unfortunately, in large scale environments, there are bound to be areas devoid of features visible by a laser rangefinder, like open atria or corridors with glass walls. In such situations, the error in localization estimates using laser rangefinders could grow in an unbounded manner. Localization algorithms that use depth cameras, like the Microsoft Kinect sensor, have similar characteristics. WiFi signal strength based algorithms, on the other hand, are applicable anywhere there is dense WiFi coverage, and have bounded errors. Although the minimum error of WiFi based localization may be greater than that of laser rangefinder or depth camera based localization, the maximum error of WiFi based localization is bounded and less than that of the other algorithms. Hence, in our work, we analyze the strengths of localization using all three sensors - using a laser rangefinder, a depth camera, and using WiFi. We identify sensors that are most accurate at localization for different locations on the map. The mobile robot could then, for example, rely on WiFi localization more in open areas or areas with glass walls, and laser rangefinder and depth camera based localization in corridor and office environments.

Localization, Mobile Robots, Sensor Fusion


Text Reference
Manuela Veloso , "Multi-Sensor Mobile Robot Localization For Diverse Environments," Proceedings of the RoboCup Symposium, August, 2013.

BibTeX Reference
   author = "Manuela {Veloso }",
   title = "Multi-Sensor Mobile Robot Localization For Diverse Environments",
   booktitle = "Proceedings of the RoboCup Symposium",
   month = "August",
   year = "2013",